![]() Challenge your colleagues to do the same and call you out when you let it slip. Why make your actions appear smaller or less significant? ![]() Using the word “just” before a declaration diminishes the intent. We talked about what it seemed to imply - everyone agreed - and how different that message was from the way we saw ourselves: trusted advisers, true partners, win-win champions of customer success.” I sent a memo to my work teammates about the “J” word and suggested a moratorium on using it. As I started really listening, I realized that striking it from a phrase almost always clarified and strengthened the message.Īnd as I began to pay attention, I was astonished - believe me - at how often I used the word. Yet I began to notice that just wasn’t about being polite: It was a subtle message of subordination, of deference. ![]() “I am all about respectful communication. Here’s an excerpt from the article that inspired this post: I put together a list of words and phrases I use to a fault. They muddy expectations and downplay authority. The words “just” and “but” and “try” all diminish the quality of our input and ability to complete tasks. When you start thinking about the words we use to soften our language, they begin to reveal a lot about how we view ourselves in the workplace. Softer language is often used in delivering feedback and critiques, but are some of our language choices selling ourselves short in the eye of our superiors? High levels of emotional EQ, collaborative working style, active leadership techniques, etc. I’ve always felt women have particular advantages in working environments. Such checks would not show many court-ordered juvenile commitments in Texas because they are not currently being reported.My studio mates and I were chatting about client communication the other week, and Colleen (otherwise known as 2nd Truth) mentioned this article on women’s tendency to overuse the word “just.” It got me thinking about my experiences in consulting and how different my language and tone tends to be based on who I’m working with. But an investigation by the news organizations found that local court clerks were not sharing that information for juveniles, either as a matter of policy or because they didn’t believe that they had to because the law did not explicitly mention them.įurther heightening the importance of closing the reporting gap, Congress passed gun reform legislation in June that includes a requirement that federal investigators check state databases for juvenile mental health records. Federally licensed dealers must check the system before they sell someone a firearm.Įlliott Naishtat, a former state lawmaker from Austin who authored the legislation in 2009, said he intended for it to apply to juveniles as well as adults. The state’s top law enforcement agency is charged with sending those records to the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System, known as NICS. Leach represents the city of Allen, where a gunman killed eight people at a mall on May 6.Ĭurrently, Texas law requires county and district clerks across the state to send information on court-ordered mental health hospitalizations to the Department of Public Safety. “This bill will go a long way to ensuring that our state and federal databases are linked and that the process is more efficient and effective in keeping firearms out of the hands of dangerous Texans who do not need to have them,” Jeff Leach, a Republican state representative from North Texas, who sponsored the legislation said on the House floor. A spokesperson for Abbott did not immediately respond to an inquiry about whether he supports the bill. Huffman could not be reached for comment. Joan Huffman, offers a rare example of gun-related legislation that has cleared the Texas Legislature since last year’s school shooting in Uvalde. The passage of the bipartisan measure, authored by Republican state Sen. The bill, which had already received unanimous support in the Senate, comes nearly a year after a ProPublica and Texas Tribune investigation revealed a gap in the law that required such reporting for adults but not for juveniles. On Wednesday, the Texas House of Representatives voted 116-28 in favor of a bill that requires courts to report involuntary mental health hospitalizations of juveniles age 16 and older for inclusion in the federal gun background check system. ( TEXAS TRIBUNE & PRO PUBLICA ) - Texas lawmakers have closed a loophole in state law that allowed people who had serious mental health issues as juveniles to legally purchase firearms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |